Vikram scores better than Abhishek Bachchan about Mani Ratnam's Raavan a.ka. Raavanan are far from over. Even though it has got moderate response, still the movie is making news. Now, critics have started scanning Abhishek Bachchan's and Vikram's performances about who has portrayed the lead role better?
It is understood that Tamil audience will rate Vikram acting as a best and Hindi audience will give thumbs-up to Abhishek's role. But the fact is, the fans who have seen both the version can only answer this question. Film critics have rated Abhishek's acting and dialogue delivery in the Raavan have not reached the expectations of the audience.

To add salt to the injury, Abhishek's diving stunt in the film was caught in the controversy, when the stuntman Balaram stated that it was performed by him and not by Abhishek. Whereas his counterpart Vikram performance has been appreciated in both the version and critics has rated his acting as outstanding.

Whom do you rate as a better, Vikram or Abhishek? drop your comments below.


  1. I Saw a Both Hindi and Tamil Versions. I Feel that Vikram done his best in Both roles of Both Versions. Don't Compare him with Abhisehk Batchan who gave Just minimum.

  2. நான் இரு மொழி படங்களையும் பார்த்தேன். முதலில் ஹிந்தி பதிப்பை பார்த்தேன். பிறகு தமிழை பார்த்தேன். அப்போது ஒன்று மட்டும் எனக்கு தோன்றியது. தமிழில் வீரா மற்றும் தேவ் ஆகிய இரு ரோல்களையும் ஏன் சீயான் விக்ரமே செய்திருக்க கூடாது. அந்த அளவு வித்யாசமான நடிப்பை இரு பதிப்புகளிலும் தந்துள்ளார். அவரது நடிப்புடன் அபிசேக் நடிப்பா........? . தயவு செய்து கேவலப்படுத்தாதீர்கள் சார்


Post a Comment

Most Recent